Theory of Motivation

-

Maslow’s Need Hierarchy Theory

Maslow's Need Hierarchy Theory is one of the most well-known theories of motivation. It is based on human needs and proposes that these needs are arranged in a hierarchical order from lower to higher levels. According to Maslow, once a lower level need is satisfied, it no longer serves to motivate an individual, and the next higher level need is activated.

Hierarchy of Needs

  • Physiological Needs:
    • Basic survival needs such as food, water, air, clothing, and shelter.
    • These needs must be met first before any other needs can influence behavior.
  • Safety Needs:
    • Needs for security and protection from physical and emotional harm.
    • Includes desires for stability, order, and control in life.
  • Social Needs:
    • Needs for belonging, love, and social interaction.
    • Humans have an inherent need to form relationships, be part of groups, and feel accepted.
  • Esteem Needs:
    • Needs for self-esteem and self-respect.
    • Encompasses desires for achievement, competence, recognition, and independence.
  • Self-Actualization Needs:
    • The need for personal growth, self-fulfillment, and realizing one’s potential.
    • Represents the culmination of all other needs being satisfied.

Key Points

  • Sequential Satisfaction: Each level of need must be reasonably satisfied before the next level becomes a motivator.
  • Unlimited Needs: Human needs are endless; once one is fulfilled, another emerges.

Criticisms

  • Non-Hierarchical Order: Needs may not follow a strict hierarchical order and can overlap.
  • Contextual Variability: The hierarchy might not apply universally across different contexts and times.
  • Multiple Motivations: Human behavior is often driven by multiple needs simultaneously, not just one at a time.
  • Permanent Lower Motivation: Some individuals may remain satisfied with lower-level needs due to chronic conditions, such as unemployment.

Relevance and Recognition

  • Despite criticisms, Maslow’s theory is widely recognized and used, particularly for its intuitive appeal and simplicity.
  • Practicing managers appreciate its clear and logical structure, making it a durable and popular tool for understanding motivation.

Summary

Maslow’s Need Hierarchy Theory suggests that human needs are structured in a hierarchy, starting from basic physiological needs to the need for self-actualization. Once a lower need is satisfied, it no longer motivates, and the next higher need takes precedence. While the theory is intuitive and widely used, it faces criticisms for its rigid hierarchical structure and assumption that needs are satisfied sequentially. Nonetheless, it remains a foundational concept in understanding human motivation.

Herzberg’s Motivation-Hygiene Theory

Frederick Herzberg extended Maslow's work and introduced the Motivation-Hygiene Theory, also known as the Two-Factor Theory. Herzberg studied 200 accountants and engineers to identify factors that caused job satisfaction and dissatisfaction. He used the critical incident method, asking participants to recall moments they felt exceptionally good or bad about their jobs.

Key Findings

  • Motivators (Job Satisfiers)
    • Factors that lead to job satisfaction.
    • Includes achievement, recognition, the work itself, responsibility, and advancement.
    • These factors are intrinsic to the job and motivate employees to perform better.
  • Hygiene Factors (Job Dissatisfiers)
    • Factors that lead to job dissatisfaction.
    • Includes company policies, supervision, salary, interpersonal relations, and working conditions.
    • These factors are extrinsic to the job and, while they do not motivate, their absence can cause dissatisfaction.

Dual Continuum Concept

  • Herzberg proposed a dual continuum: the opposite of satisfaction is not dissatisfaction but no satisfaction, and the opposite of dissatisfaction is no dissatisfaction.
  • Removing dissatisfying elements does not create satisfaction but merely removes dissatisfaction.

Criticisms of Herzberg’s Theory

  • Attribution Bias: People may credit themselves for successes and blame external factors for failures.
  • Focus on Job Satisfaction: The theory primarily explains job satisfaction rather than overall motivation.
  • Partial Satisfaction: Individuals might find parts of their job unsatisfactory yet still accept the job overall.
  • Neglects Situational Variables: Does not account for situational factors that could influence motivation.
  • Overlap of Factors: Salary often appears as both a motivator and a hygiene factor due to its complex nature.

Practical Implications

Despite criticisms, Herzberg’s theory is widely recognized and used in managerial practices. It is particularly useful in:

  • Job Design: Ensuring jobs are structured to enhance intrinsic motivators.
  • Employee Management: Understanding factors that could lead to job dissatisfaction and addressing them.

Summary

Herzberg’s Motivation-Hygiene Theory distinguishes between factors that cause job satisfaction (motivators) and those that cause job dissatisfaction (hygiene factors). While motivators are intrinsic and drive better performance, hygiene factors are extrinsic and prevent dissatisfaction. This dual continuum approach has been influential in management, despite criticisms related to its scope and the overlap of factors.

Contemporary Theories of Motivation

Self-Determination Theory (SDT)

Developed by Edward Deci and Richard Ryan, SDT emphasizes that people are motivated by three innate psychological needs:

  • Competence: Mastery of tasks and learning new skills.
  • Connection (Relatedness): Sense of belonging and attachment to others.
  • Autonomy: Control over one's own actions and goals.

Key Assumptions:

  • Need for Growth Drives Behavior: People are oriented towards personal growth and mastery.
  • Importance of Autonomous Motivation: Internal sources of motivation (intrinsic) are more effective than external rewards (extrinsic).

Example: A self-determined individual acknowledges their fault in an incomplete project and takes proactive steps to rectify it, whereas someone with low self-determination might blame external factors and feel helpless.

Self-Efficacy Theory

Proposed by Albert Bandura, it focuses on the belief in one's ability to succeed in specific situations. Four sources contribute to self-efficacy:

  • Experience: Success in similar past tasks boosts confidence.
  • Vicarious Experience: Observing similar others succeed can enhance self-efficacy.
  • Social Persuasion: Encouragement from others can increase self-belief.
  • Physiological Feedback: Physical sensations are interpreted positively or negatively based on one's confidence.

Example: Successfully completing a presentation boosts confidence for future presentations, while observing a peer succeed in a task can also enhance self-efficacy.

Vroom’s Expectancy Theory

Developed by Victor Vroom, this theory posits that motivation is a result of individual expectations of achieving desired outcomes through certain behaviors. It is based on three components:

  • Valence: The value an individual places on the expected outcome.
  • Instrumentality: The belief that performance will lead to a specific outcome.
  • Expectancy: The belief that effort will lead to the desired performance.

Formula: Motivation = ∑ (Valence x Instrumentality x Expectancy)

Example: An employee who values promotion (valence), believes that high performance leads to promotion (instrumentality), and feels confident that their effort will result in high performance (expectancy) will be highly motivated to work efficiently.

Summary

  • Self-Determination Theory: Focuses on intrinsic motivation driven by the need for competence, connection, and autonomy.
  • Self-Efficacy Theory: Emphasizes belief in one's ability to succeed, influenced by experience, observation, social persuasion, and physiological states.
  • Vroom’s Expectancy Theory: Suggests that motivation is determined by the expected outcomes of actions, influenced by valence, instrumentality, and expectancy.

These contemporary theories offer more nuanced insights into motivation, highlighting the importance of intrinsic factors, individual beliefs, and cognitive evaluations in driving behavior.