Leadership and its Theories

-

 Leadership Styles

Leadership styles refer to the behavioral patterns that a leader adopts to influence the behavior of their followers. These styles define how a leader gives directions, motivates subordinates, and accomplishes objectives. Leadership styles can be classified based on two main approaches: behavioral and situational. Below is a detailed explanation of these approaches and their corresponding models and theories.

Based on Behavioral Approach

1. Power Orientation

Power orientation focuses on the degree of authority a leader uses to influence their subordinates. Based on this, leadership styles can be classified into:

  • Autocratic Leadership: The leader makes decisions unilaterally, with little or no input from subordinates. This style is characterized by individual control, clear expectations, and minimal group participation.
  • Participative Leadership: The leader involves subordinates in decision-making processes. This style encourages collaboration, with leaders sharing power and information, fostering a sense of ownership and commitment among employees.
  • Laissez-Faire Leadership: The leader provides minimal guidance and allows subordinates to make decisions independently. This style works well with highly skilled and motivated employees who require little supervision.

2. Leadership as a Continuum

Tannenbaum and Schmidt proposed that leadership styles range between two extremes: autocratic and free-rein (laissez-faire). This continuum suggests that leaders can adopt various styles based on the situation, moving fluidly between directive and non-directive approaches.

3. Employee-Production Orientation

Research indicates that leadership behavior is influenced by the characteristics of employee and production orientation:

  • Employee Orientation: Focuses on the welfare and needs of employees, similar to democratic leadership. Leaders who adopt this style prioritize employee development, satisfaction, and team cohesion.
  • Production Orientation: Emphasizes task completion and technical aspects of work, akin to autocratic leadership. Leaders with this orientation prioritize efficiency, productivity, and achieving organizational goals.

4. Likert’s Management System

Rensis Likert identified four systems of management based on leadership patterns and behaviors:

  • Exploitative Authoritative: Leaders have little trust in subordinates, make decisions unilaterally, and use fear-based methods to motivate.
  • Benevolent Authoritative: Leaders show some trust in subordinates, make most decisions themselves but may listen to subordinates' opinions, and use rewards as motivation.
  • Consultative System: Leaders have substantial trust in subordinates, seek their input, and make decisions after consultation.
  • Participative System: Leaders have complete trust in subordinates, engage in group decision-making, and foster a highly collaborative environment.

5. Managerial Grid

Blake and Mouton’s managerial grid assesses leadership style based on concern for people and concern for production:

  • Country Club Management (high people, low production): Focus on employee comfort and satisfaction.
  • Produce or Perish Management (low people, high production): Emphasize task completion and productivity.
  • Impoverished Management (low people, low production): Minimal effort on managing, leading to ineffective leadership.
  • Team Management (high people, high production): High regard for both employee needs and productivity, considered the most effective style.

6. Three-Dimensional Grid

W.J. Reddin’s 3-D leadership model incorporates task-oriented, relationship-oriented, and effectiveness dimensions. This model evaluates how a leader's behavior adapts to different situations and environments, considering the effectiveness of the leadership style in achieving desired outcomes.

Based on Situational Approach

1. Fiedler’s Contingency Model

Fred Fiedler’s model posits that effective leadership depends on the fit between a leader’s style and specific situational variables. The three elements of this model are:

  • Leadership Style: Either task-oriented or relationship-oriented.
  • Situational Variables: Leader-member relations, task structure, and leader’s position power.
  • Interrelationship: The effectiveness of leadership is determined by the match between the leader’s style and the favorableness of the situation.

2. Hersey and Blanchard’s Situational Model

According to this model, effective leadership is dependent on the maturity level of subordinates, which includes their ability and willingness to accomplish tasks. Leaders should adapt their style to the developmental level of their followers:

  • Telling (Directing): High task, low relationship – best for low maturity subordinates.
  • Selling (Coaching): High task, high relationship – suitable for moderate maturity subordinates who need support and direction.
  • Participating (Supporting): Low task, high relationship – works for higher maturity subordinates who need support but not direction.
  • Delegating: Low task, low relationship – appropriate for high maturity subordinates who are capable and motivated.

3. Path-Goal Model

Robert House’s Path-Goal Theory suggests that a leader’s primary function is to clear the path for subordinates to achieve their goals. Leaders must adapt their style based on the situation and subordinate needs. The main leadership styles in this model are:

  • Directive Leadership: Providing clear guidelines and expectations.
  • Supportive Leadership: Showing concern for subordinates’ well-being.
  • Participative Leadership: Involving subordinates in decision-making.
  • Achievement-Oriented Leadership: Setting challenging goals and expecting high performance.

Conclusion

Understanding and applying various leadership styles is crucial for effective leadership. Leaders must assess their own behavior, the needs of their subordinates, and the situational context to choose the most appropriate style. By doing so, leaders can enhance their effectiveness, foster better relationships, and achieve organizational goals more efficiently.